Burkina Faso vs Finland: Men's universal right to vote

Burkina Faso
1
in 2025
Finland
1
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
1st
Finland rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Finland
00.20.40.60.81180919172025

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 1 against 1 in Finland, a difference of 0.

Across all 92 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 1st and Finland ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Finland Difference Ahead
1910s 0 1 1 Finland
1920s 0 1 1 Finland
1930s 0 1 1 Finland
1940s 0 1 1 Finland
1950s 0.3 1 0.7 Finland
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Burkina Faso or Finland?
Burkina Faso, at 1 against 1 in Finland as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Burkina Faso and Finland?
0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Finland?
92 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Finland rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Burkina Faso ranks 1st and Finland ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.