Bulgaria vs Kyrgyzstan: Men's universal right to vote

Bulgaria
1
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan
1
in 2025
Bulgaria rank
1st
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Kyrgyzstan
00.20.40.60.81186819462025

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 1 against 1 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 148 shared years of data; in 1878 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1870s 0.5 0 0.5 Bulgaria
1880s 1 0 1 Bulgaria
1890s 1 0 1 Bulgaria
1900s 1 0.5 0.5 Bulgaria
1910s 1 1 0 β€”
1920s 1 1 0 β€”
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Bulgaria or Kyrgyzstan?
Bulgaria, at 1 against 1 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Bulgaria and Kyrgyzstan?
0, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Kyrgyzstan?
148 years are reported by both, from 1878 to 2025.
How do Bulgaria and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Bulgaria ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.