Bulgaria vs El Salvador: Men's universal right to vote

Bulgaria
1
in 2025
El Salvador
1
in 2025
Bulgaria rank
1st
El Salvador rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Bulgaria
  • El Salvador
00.20.40.60.81183819312025

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 1 against 1 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 148 shared years of data; in 1878 it was El Salvador ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 1st and El Salvador ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria El Salvador Difference Ahead
1870s 0.5 0 0.5 Bulgaria
1880s 1 0.7 0.3 Bulgaria
1890s 1 1 0 β€”
1900s 1 1 0 β€”
1910s 1 1 0 β€”
1920s 1 1 0 β€”
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Bulgaria or El Salvador?
Bulgaria, at 1 against 1 in El Salvador as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Bulgaria and El Salvador?
0, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and El Salvador?
148 years are reported by both, from 1878 to 2025.
How do Bulgaria and El Salvador rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Bulgaria ranks 1st and El Salvador ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.