Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealand: Men's universal right to vote
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1
in 2025
New Zealand
1
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- New Zealand
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1 against 1 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 108 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 198 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Zealand?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1 against 1 in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.