Bahamas vs Guinea-Bissau: Men's universal right to vote

Bahamas
1
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau
1
in 2025
Bahamas rank
1st
Guinea-Bissau rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Bahamas
  • Guinea-Bissau
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 1 against 1 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 134 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Bahamas ranks 1st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0.4 0 0.4 Bahamas
1960s 1 0 1 Bahamas
1970s 1 0.6 0.4 Bahamas
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Bahamas or Guinea-Bissau?
Bahamas, at 1 against 1 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Bahamas and Guinea-Bissau?
0, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Guinea-Bissau?
134 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2025.
How do Bahamas and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Bahamas ranks 1st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.