Azerbaijan vs Djibouti: Men's universal right to vote

Azerbaijan
1
in 2025
Djibouti
1
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
1st
Djibouti rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Djibouti
00.20.40.60.81181319192025

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 1 against 1 in Djibouti, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 141 shared years of data; in 1885 it was Djibouti ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 1st and Djibouti ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Djibouti Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0.5 0 0.5 Azerbaijan
1910s 1 0 1 Azerbaijan
1920s 1 0 1 Azerbaijan
1930s 1 0 1 Azerbaijan
1940s 1 0 1 Azerbaijan
1950s 1 0.3 0.7 Azerbaijan
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Azerbaijan or Djibouti?
Azerbaijan, at 1 against 1 in Djibouti as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Azerbaijan and Djibouti?
0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Djibouti?
141 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2025.
How do Azerbaijan and Djibouti rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Azerbaijan ranks 1st and Djibouti ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.