Azerbaijan vs Cote d'Ivoire: Men's universal right to vote
Azerbaijan
1
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire
1
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
1st
Cote d'Ivoire rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Azerbaijan
- Cote d'Ivoire
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 1 against 1 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 133 shared years of data; in 1893 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 1st and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Cote d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Azerbaijan |
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Azerbaijan |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Azerbaijan |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Azerbaijan |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Azerbaijan |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | Azerbaijan |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Azerbaijan or Cote d'Ivoire?
- Azerbaijan, at 1 against 1 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Azerbaijan and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Azerbaijan and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Azerbaijan ranks 1st and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.