Austria vs Burkina Faso: Men's universal right to vote

Austria
1
in 2025
Burkina Faso
1
in 2025
Austria rank
1st
Burkina Faso rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Austria
  • Burkina Faso
00.20.40.60.81186719462025

How they compare

Austria currently reports 1 against 1 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 92 shared years of data; in 1919 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 1st and Burkina Faso ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Burkina Faso Difference Ahead
1910s 1 0 1 Austria
1920s 1 0 1 Austria
1930s 1 0 1 Austria
1940s 1 0 1 Austria
1950s 1 0.3 0.7 Austria
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Austria or Burkina Faso?
Austria, at 1 against 1 in Burkina Faso as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Austria and Burkina Faso?
0, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Burkina Faso?
92 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2025.
How do Austria and Burkina Faso rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Austria ranks 1st and Burkina Faso ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.