Australia vs El Salvador: Men's universal right to vote

Australia
1
in 2025
El Salvador
1
in 2025
Australia rank
1st
El Salvador rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Australia
  • El Salvador
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1 against 1 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.

Across all 188 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 1st and El Salvador ranks 1st of 197 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia El Salvador Difference Ahead
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0.7 0.7 El Salvador
1890s 0.4 1 0.6 El Salvador
1900s 1 1 0 β€”
1910s 1 1 0 β€”
1920s 1 1 0 β€”
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Australia or El Salvador?
Australia, at 1 against 1 in El Salvador as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Australia and El Salvador?
0, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and El Salvador?
188 years are reported by both, from 1838 to 2025.
How do Australia and El Salvador rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Australia ranks 1st and El Salvador ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.