Australia vs Burkina Faso: Men's universal right to vote

Australia
1
in 2025
Burkina Faso
1
in 2025
Australia rank
1st
Burkina Faso rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Australia
  • Burkina Faso
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1 against 1 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 92 shared years of data; in 1919 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 1st and Burkina Faso ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Burkina Faso Difference Ahead
1910s 1 0 1 Australia
1920s 1 0 1 Australia
1930s 1 0 1 Australia
1940s 1 0 1 Australia
1950s 1 0.3 0.7 Australia
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Australia or Burkina Faso?
Australia, at 1 against 1 in Burkina Faso as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Australia and Burkina Faso?
0, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Burkina Faso?
92 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2025.
How do Australia and Burkina Faso rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Australia ranks 1st and Burkina Faso ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.