Angola vs Cote d'Ivoire: Men's universal right to vote

Angola
1
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire
1
in 2025
Angola rank
1st
Cote d'Ivoire rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Angola
  • Cote d'Ivoire
00.20.40.60.81188519552025

How they compare

Angola currently reports 1 against 1 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.

Across all 133 years both countries report, Cote d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 1st and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Cote d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0.3 0.3 Cote d'Ivoire
1960s 0 1 1 Cote d'Ivoire
1970s 0.5 1 0.5 Cote d'Ivoire
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Angola or Cote d'Ivoire?
Angola, at 1 against 1 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Angola and Cote d'Ivoire?
0, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Cote d'Ivoire?
133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
How do Angola and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Angola ranks 1st and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.