Angola vs Antigua and Barbuda: Men's universal right to vote

Angola
1
in 2025
Antigua and Barbuda
1
in 2025
Angola rank
1st
Antigua and Barbuda rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Angola
  • Antigua and Barbuda
00.20.40.60.81188519552025

How they compare

Angola currently reports 1 against 1 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.

Across all 75 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 1st and Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Antigua and Barbuda Difference Ahead
1950s 0 1 1 Antigua and Barbuda
1960s 0 1 1 Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0.5 1 0.5 Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Angola or Antigua and Barbuda?
Angola, at 1 against 1 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Angola and Antigua and Barbuda?
0, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Antigua and Barbuda?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Angola and Antigua and Barbuda rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Angola ranks 1st and Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.