Afghanistan vs Singapore: Men's universal right to vote
Afghanistan
1
in 2025
Singapore
1
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Afghanistan
- Singapore
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 1 against 1 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 159 shared years of data; in 1867 it was Singapore ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0.9 | 0 | 0.9 | Afghanistan |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Afghanistan |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | Afghanistan |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Afghanistan or Singapore?
- Afghanistan, at 1 against 1 in Singapore as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Afghanistan and Singapore?
- 0, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Singapore?
- 159 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2025.
- How do Afghanistan and Singapore rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Afghanistan ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.