Afghanistan vs Gambia: Men's universal right to vote

Afghanistan
1
in 2025
Gambia
1
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
1st
Gambia rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Gambia
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 1 against 1 in Gambia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 137 shared years of data; in 1889 it was Gambia ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 1st and Gambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Gambia Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0.9 0 0.9 Afghanistan
1940s 1 0 1 Afghanistan
1950s 1 0 1 Afghanistan
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Afghanistan or Gambia?
Afghanistan, at 1 against 1 in Gambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Afghanistan and Gambia?
0, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Gambia?
137 years are reported by both, from 1889 to 2025.
How do Afghanistan and Gambia rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Afghanistan ranks 1st and Gambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.