Afghanistan vs Dominica: Men's universal right to vote

Afghanistan
1
in 2025
Dominica
1
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
1st
Dominica rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Dominica
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 1 against 1 in Dominica, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 102 shared years of data; in 1924 it was Dominica ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 1st and Dominica ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Dominica Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0.9 0 0.9 Afghanistan
1940s 1 0 1 Afghanistan
1950s 1 0.9 0.1 Afghanistan
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Afghanistan or Dominica?
Afghanistan, at 1 against 1 in Dominica as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Afghanistan and Dominica?
0, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Dominica?
102 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2025.
How do Afghanistan and Dominica rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Afghanistan ranks 1st and Dominica ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.