Syria vs Tajikistan: Universal right to vote

Syria
2
in 2025
Tajikistan
2
in 2025
Syria rank
1st
Tajikistan rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Syria
  • Tajikistan
00.511.52186819462025

How they compare

Syria currently reports 2 against 2 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.

Across all 108 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.

Syria ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Syria Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1910s 0 2 2 Tajikistan
1920s 0.2 2 1.8 Tajikistan
1930s 1 2 1 Tajikistan
1940s 1 2 1 Tajikistan
1950s 1.7 2 0.3 Tajikistan
1960s 2 2 0
1970s 2 2 0
1980s 2 2 0
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Syria or Tajikistan?
Syria, at 2 against 2 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Syria and Tajikistan?
0, with Syria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Syria and Tajikistan?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Syria and Tajikistan rank globally for universal right to vote?
Syria ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.