Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tuvalu: Universal right to vote

Saint Kitts and Nevis
2
in 2025
Tuvalu
2
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Tuvalu rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Tuvalu
00.511.52193719812025

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 2 against 2 in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Tuvalu?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 2 against 2 in Tuvalu as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tuvalu?
0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tuvalu?
51 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2025.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tuvalu rank globally for universal right to vote?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.