Saint Kitts and Nevis vs East Timor: Universal right to vote
Universal right to vote over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- East Timor
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 2 against 2 in East Timor, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 89 shared years of data; in 1937 it was East Timor ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Saint Kitts and Nevis or East Timor?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 2 against 2 in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Saint Kitts and Nevis and East Timor?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and East Timor?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and East Timor rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.