Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tajikistan: Universal right to vote

Saint Kitts and Nevis
2
in 2025
Tajikistan
2
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Tajikistan rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Tajikistan
00.511.52186819462025

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 2 against 2 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.

Across all 89 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1930s 0 2 2 Tajikistan
1940s 0 2 2 Tajikistan
1950s 1.6 2 0.4 Tajikistan
1960s 2 2 0 β€”
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Tajikistan?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 2 against 2 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tajikistan?
0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tajikistan?
89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tajikistan rank globally for universal right to vote?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.