Senegal vs Trinidad and Tobago: Universal right to vote
Senegal
2
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
2
in 2025
Senegal rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Senegal
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 2 against 2 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 122 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Senegal ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Senegal | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Senegal or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Senegal, at 2 against 2 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Senegal and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 122 years are reported by both, from 1904 to 2025.
- How do Senegal and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Senegal ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.