San Marino vs St. Kitts and Nevis: Universal right to vote
Universal right to vote over time
- San Marino
- St. Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 2 against 2 in St. Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 89 shared years of data; in 1937 it was San Marino ahead.
San Marino ranks 1st and St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, San Marino averaged higher in 2 and St. Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | St. Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | San Marino |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | San Marino |
| 1950s | 1.3 | 1.6 | 0.3 | St. Kitts and Nevis |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, San Marino or St. Kitts and Nevis?
- San Marino, at 2 against 2 in St. Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between San Marino and St. Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and St. Kitts and Nevis?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
- How do San Marino and St. Kitts and Nevis rank globally for universal right to vote?
- San Marino ranks 1st and St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.