Papua New Guinea vs Turkey: Universal right to vote

Papua New Guinea
2
in 2025
Turkey
2
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Turkey rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Turkey
00.511.52188419542025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 2 against 2 in Turkey, a difference of 0.

Across all 105 years both countries report, Turkey has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Turkey ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Turkey Difference Ahead
1920s 0 1 1 Turkey
1930s 0 2 2 Turkey
1940s 0 2 2 Turkey
1950s 0.9 2 1.1 Turkey
1960s 1.6 2 0.4 Turkey
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Papua New Guinea or Turkey?
Papua New Guinea, at 2 against 2 in Turkey as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Papua New Guinea and Turkey?
0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Turkey?
105 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2025.
How do Papua New Guinea and Turkey rank globally for universal right to vote?
Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Turkey ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.