Niger vs Sao Tome and Principe: Universal right to vote

Niger
2
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
2
in 2025
Niger rank
1st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Niger
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Niger currently reports 2 against 2 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Niger ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0.6 0 0.6 Niger
1960s 2 0 2 Niger
1970s 2 1 1 Niger
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Niger or Sao Tome and Principe?
Niger, at 2 against 2 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Niger and Sao Tome and Principe?
0, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Sao Tome and Principe?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Niger and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for universal right to vote?
Niger ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.