New Zealand vs Saint Lucia: Universal right to vote

New Zealand
2
in 2025
Saint Lucia
2
in 2025
New Zealand rank
1st
Saint Lucia rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • New Zealand
  • Saint Lucia
00.511.52184119332025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 2 against 2 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.

Across all 75 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 1st and Saint Lucia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1950s 2 2 0 β€”
1960s 2 2 0 β€”
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, New Zealand or Saint Lucia?
New Zealand, at 2 against 2 in Saint Lucia as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between New Zealand and Saint Lucia?
0, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Saint Lucia?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do New Zealand and Saint Lucia rank globally for universal right to vote?
New Zealand ranks 1st and Saint Lucia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.