Latvia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Universal right to vote

Latvia
2
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
2
in 2025
Latvia rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Latvia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.511.52188919572025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 2 against 2 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1910s 2 0 2 Latvia
1920s 2 0 2 Latvia
1930s 2 0 2 Latvia
1940s 2 0.8 1.2 Latvia
1950s 2 2 0 β€”
1960s 2 2 0 β€”
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Latvia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Latvia, at 2 against 2 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago?
0, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for universal right to vote?
Latvia ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.