Kyrgyzstan vs Zambia: Universal right to vote

Kyrgyzstan
2
in 2025
Zambia
2
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Zambia
00.511.52186819462025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 2 against 2 in Zambia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Zambia Difference Ahead
1910s 1.33 0 1.33 Kyrgyzstan
1920s 2 0 2 Kyrgyzstan
1930s 2 0 2 Kyrgyzstan
1940s 2 0 2 Kyrgyzstan
1950s 2 0 2 Kyrgyzstan
1960s 2 1.2 0.8 Kyrgyzstan
1970s 2 2 0
1980s 2 2 0
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Kyrgyzstan or Zambia?
Kyrgyzstan, at 2 against 2 in Zambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Kyrgyzstan and Zambia?
0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Zambia?
115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Zambia rank globally for universal right to vote?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.