Kyrgyzstan vs Turkey: Universal right to vote

Kyrgyzstan
2
in 2025
Turkey
2
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Turkey rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Turkey
00.511.52186819462025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 2 against 2 in Turkey, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 105 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Turkey ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Turkey Difference Ahead
1920s 2 1 1 Kyrgyzstan
1930s 2 2 0
1940s 2 2 0
1950s 2 2 0
1960s 2 2 0
1970s 2 2 0
1980s 2 2 0
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Kyrgyzstan or Turkey?
Kyrgyzstan, at 2 against 2 in Turkey as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Kyrgyzstan and Turkey?
0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Turkey?
105 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Turkey rank globally for universal right to vote?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Turkey ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.