Kyrgyzstan vs Portugal: Universal right to vote

Kyrgyzstan
2
in 2025
Portugal
2
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Portugal rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Portugal
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 2 against 2 in Portugal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 158 shared years of data; in 1868 it was Portugal ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Portugal ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Portugal Difference Ahead
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0.5 0 0.5 Kyrgyzstan
1910s 1.3 0 1.3 Kyrgyzstan
1920s 2 0 2 Kyrgyzstan
1930s 2 0 2 Kyrgyzstan
1940s 2 0 2 Kyrgyzstan
1950s 2 0 2 Kyrgyzstan
1960s 2 0 2 Kyrgyzstan
1970s 2 1 1 Kyrgyzstan
1980s 2 2 0
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Kyrgyzstan or Portugal?
Kyrgyzstan, at 2 against 2 in Portugal as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Kyrgyzstan and Portugal?
0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Portugal?
158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Portugal rank globally for universal right to vote?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Portugal ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.