Kyrgyzstan vs Luxembourg: Universal right to vote
Kyrgyzstan
2
in 2025
Luxembourg
2
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Luxembourg rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 2 against 2 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 158 shared years of data; in 1868 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1910s | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1920s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Kyrgyzstan or Luxembourg?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 2 against 2 in Luxembourg as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Kyrgyzstan and Luxembourg?
- 0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Luxembourg?
- 158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Luxembourg rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.