Kyrgyzstan vs Lebanon: Universal right to vote
Kyrgyzstan
2
in 2025
Lebanon
2
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Lebanon rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Lebanon
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 2 against 2 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Lebanon ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1920s | 2 | 0.3 | 1.7 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1930s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1940s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1950s | 2 | 1.8 | 0.2 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Kyrgyzstan or Lebanon?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 2 against 2 in Lebanon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Kyrgyzstan and Lebanon?
- 0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Lebanon?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Lebanon rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Lebanon ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.