South Korea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Universal right to vote
South Korea
2
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
2
in 2025
South Korea rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- South Korea
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 2 against 2 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 78 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, South Korea or Trinidad and Tobago?
- South Korea, at 2 against 2 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between South Korea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 78 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2025.
- How do South Korea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for universal right to vote?
- South Korea ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.