Kazakhstan vs North Korea: Universal right to vote

Kazakhstan
2
in 2025
North Korea
2
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
1st
North Korea rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • North Korea
00.511.52180019122025

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 2 against 2 in North Korea, a difference of 0.

Across all 78 years both countries report, North Korea has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 1st and North Korea ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan North Korea Difference Ahead
1940s 2 2 0 β€”
1950s 2 2 0 β€”
1960s 2 2 0 β€”
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Kazakhstan or North Korea?
Kazakhstan, at 2 against 2 in North Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Kazakhstan and North Korea?
0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and North Korea?
78 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2025.
How do Kazakhstan and North Korea rank globally for universal right to vote?
Kazakhstan ranks 1st and North Korea ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.