Jordan vs South Africa: Universal right to vote
Jordan
2
in 2025
South Africa
2
in 2025
Jordan rank
1st
South Africa rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Jordan
- South Africa
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 2 against 2 in South Africa, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was South Africa ahead.
Jordan ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 1.6 | 0 | 1.6 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Jordan or South Africa?
- Jordan, at 2 against 2 in South Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Jordan and South Africa?
- 0, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and South Africa?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and South Africa rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Jordan ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.