Egypt vs Papua New Guinea: Universal right to vote

Egypt
2
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
2
in 2025
Egypt rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Egypt
  • Papua New Guinea
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 2 against 2 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 142 shared years of data; in 1884 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Egypt ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0.7 0 0.7 Egypt
1930s 1 0 1 Egypt
1940s 1 0 1 Egypt
1950s 1.4 0.9 0.5 Egypt
1960s 2 1.6 0.4 Egypt
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Egypt or Papua New Guinea?
Egypt, at 2 against 2 in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Egypt and Papua New Guinea?
0, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Papua New Guinea?
142 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2025.
How do Egypt and Papua New Guinea rank globally for universal right to vote?
Egypt ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.