Dominica vs Kyrgyzstan: Universal right to vote

Dominica
2
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan
2
in 2025
Dominica rank
1st
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Dominica
  • Kyrgyzstan
00.511.52186819462025

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 2 against 2 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.

Across all 102 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.

Dominica ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1920s 0 2 2 Kyrgyzstan
1930s 0 2 2 Kyrgyzstan
1940s 0 2 2 Kyrgyzstan
1950s 1.8 2 0.2 Kyrgyzstan
1960s 2 2 0
1970s 2 2 0
1980s 2 2 0
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Dominica or Kyrgyzstan?
Dominica, at 2 against 2 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Dominica and Kyrgyzstan?
0, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Kyrgyzstan?
102 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2025.
How do Dominica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for universal right to vote?
Dominica ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.