Cote d'Ivoire vs South Sudan: Universal right to vote

Cote d'Ivoire
2
in 2025
South Sudan
2
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
1st
South Sudan rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • South Sudan
00.511.52189319592025

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 2 against 2 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 2 1.78 0.2222 Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Cote d'Ivoire or South Sudan?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 2 against 2 in South Sudan as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Cote d'Ivoire and South Sudan?
0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and South Sudan?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and South Sudan rank globally for universal right to vote?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.