Cote d'Ivoire vs San Marino: Universal right to vote

Cote d'Ivoire
2
in 2025
San Marino
2
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
1st
San Marino rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • San Marino
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 2 against 2 in San Marino, a difference of 0.

Across all 133 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 197 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire San Marino Difference Ahead
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0.1 0.1 San Marino
1910s 0 1 1 San Marino
1920s 0 1 1 San Marino
1930s 0 1 1 San Marino
1940s 0 1 1 San Marino
1950s 0.6 1.3 0.7 San Marino
1960s 2 2 0 β€”
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Cote d'Ivoire or San Marino?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 2 against 2 in San Marino as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Cote d'Ivoire and San Marino?
0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and San Marino?
133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and San Marino rank globally for universal right to vote?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.