Cote d'Ivoire vs Egypt: Universal right to vote
Cote d'Ivoire
2
in 2025
Egypt
2
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
1st
Egypt rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Egypt
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 2 against 2 in Egypt, a difference of 0.
Across all 133 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Egypt ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | Egypt |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Egypt |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Egypt |
| 1950s | 0.6 | 1.4 | 0.8 | Egypt |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Cote d'Ivoire or Egypt?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 2 against 2 in Egypt as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Cote d'Ivoire and Egypt?
- 0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Egypt?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Egypt rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Egypt ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.