Cote d'Ivoire vs Djibouti: Universal right to vote

Cote d'Ivoire
2
in 2025
Djibouti
2
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
1st
Djibouti rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Djibouti
00.511.52188519552025

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 2 against 2 in Djibouti, a difference of 0.

Across all 133 years both countries report, Djibouti has been ahead every year.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Djibouti ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Djibouti Difference Ahead
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0.6 0.6 0 β€”
1960s 2 2 0 β€”
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Cote d'Ivoire or Djibouti?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 2 against 2 in Djibouti as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Cote d'Ivoire and Djibouti?
0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Djibouti?
133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Djibouti rank globally for universal right to vote?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Djibouti ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.