Costa Rica vs Vietnam: Universal right to vote

Costa Rica
2
in 2025
Vietnam
2
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
1st
Vietnam rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Vietnam
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 2 against 2 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 166 shared years of data; in 1838 it was Vietnam ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 1st and Vietnam ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 19 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Vietnam Difference Ahead
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0.2 0 0.2 Costa Rica
1950s 2 0 2 Costa Rica
1970s 2 2 0
1980s 2 2 0
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Costa Rica or Vietnam?
Costa Rica, at 2 against 2 in Vietnam as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Costa Rica and Vietnam?
0, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Vietnam?
166 years are reported by both, from 1838 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Vietnam rank globally for universal right to vote?
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Vietnam ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.