Colombia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Universal right to vote
Universal right to vote over time
- Colombia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 2 against 2 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 89 shared years of data; in 1937 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Colombia |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Colombia |
| 1950s | 1.3 | 1.6 | 0.3 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Colombia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Colombia, at 2 against 2 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Colombia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
- How do Colombia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Colombia ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.