Chile vs North Korea: Universal right to vote

Chile
2
in 2025
North Korea
2
in 2025
Chile rank
1st
North Korea rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Chile
  • North Korea
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 2 against 2 in North Korea, a difference of 0.

Across all 78 years both countries report, North Korea has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 1st and North Korea ranks 1st of 197 countries.

North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile North Korea Difference Ahead
1940s 0 2 2 North Korea
1950s 0 2 2 North Korea
1960s 0 2 2 North Korea
1970s 2 2 0
1980s 2 2 0
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Chile or North Korea?
Chile, at 2 against 2 in North Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Chile and North Korea?
0, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and North Korea?
78 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2025.
How do Chile and North Korea rank globally for universal right to vote?
Chile ranks 1st and North Korea ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.