Burkina Faso vs East Timor: Universal right to vote
Burkina Faso
2
in 2025
East Timor
2
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
1st
East Timor rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Burkina Faso
- East Timor
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 2 against 2 in East Timor, a difference of 0.
Across all 92 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 197 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.6 | 1.4 | 0.8 | East Timor |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Burkina Faso or East Timor?
- Burkina Faso, at 2 against 2 in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Burkina Faso and East Timor?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and East Timor?
- 92 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2025.
- How do Burkina Faso and East Timor rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Burkina Faso ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.