Burkina Faso vs Pakistan: Universal right to vote

Burkina Faso
2
in 2025
Pakistan
2
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
1st
Pakistan rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Pakistan
00.511.52191919722025

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 2 against 2 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.

Across all 79 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Pakistan Difference Ahead
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0.6 0.8 0.2 Pakistan
1960s 2 2 0 β€”
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Burkina Faso or Pakistan?
Burkina Faso, at 2 against 2 in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Burkina Faso and Pakistan?
0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Pakistan?
79 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Pakistan rank globally for universal right to vote?
Burkina Faso ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.