Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Grenada: Universal right to vote

Bosnia and Herzegovina
2
in 2025
Grenada
2
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Grenada rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Grenada
00.511.52191819712025

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2 against 2 in Grenada, a difference of 0.

Across all 75 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Grenada ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Grenada Difference Ahead
1950s 2 2 0 β€”
1960s 2 2 0 β€”
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Grenada?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2 against 2 in Grenada as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Grenada?
0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Grenada?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Grenada rank globally for universal right to vote?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Grenada ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.