Bhutan vs Pakistan: Universal right to vote

Bhutan
2
in 2025
Pakistan
2
in 2025
Bhutan rank
1st
Pakistan rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Bhutan
  • Pakistan
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 2 against 2 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.

Across all 79 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Pakistan Difference Ahead
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0 0.8 0.8 Pakistan
1960s 0 2 2 Pakistan
1970s 0 2 2 Pakistan
1980s 0 2 2 Pakistan
1990s 0 2 2 Pakistan
2000s 0.6 2 1.4 Pakistan
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Bhutan or Pakistan?
Bhutan, at 2 against 2 in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Bhutan and Pakistan?
0, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Pakistan?
79 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
How do Bhutan and Pakistan rank globally for universal right to vote?
Bhutan ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.