Bahamas vs Ecuador: Universal right to vote

Bahamas
2
in 2025
Ecuador
2
in 2025
Bahamas rank
1st
Ecuador rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Bahamas
  • Ecuador
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 2 against 2 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 196 shared years of data; in 1830 it was Ecuador ahead.

Bahamas ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Ecuador Difference Ahead
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0.8 0 0.8 Bahamas
1960s 2 0 2 Bahamas
1970s 2 0.4 1.6 Bahamas
1980s 2 2 0
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Bahamas or Ecuador?
Bahamas, at 2 against 2 in Ecuador as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Bahamas and Ecuador?
0, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Ecuador?
196 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2025.
How do Bahamas and Ecuador rank globally for universal right to vote?
Bahamas ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.