Armenia vs Burkina Faso: Universal right to vote

Armenia
2
in 2025
Burkina Faso
2
in 2025
Armenia rank
1st
Burkina Faso rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Armenia
  • Burkina Faso
00.511.52191919722025

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 2 against 2 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 89 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 1st and Burkina Faso ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Burkina Faso Difference Ahead
1920s 2 0 2 Armenia
1930s 2 0 2 Armenia
1940s 2 0 2 Armenia
1950s 2 0.6 1.4 Armenia
1960s 2 2 0
1970s 2 2 0
1980s 2 2 0
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Armenia or Burkina Faso?
Armenia, at 2 against 2 in Burkina Faso as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Armenia and Burkina Faso?
0, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Burkina Faso?
89 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Armenia and Burkina Faso rank globally for universal right to vote?
Armenia ranks 1st and Burkina Faso ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.