Antigua and Barbuda vs Solomon Islands: Universal right to vote
Universal right to vote over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 2 against 2 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1960s | 2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Antigua and Barbuda or Solomon Islands?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 2 against 2 in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Antigua and Barbuda and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Solomon Islands?
- 75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Solomon Islands rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.