Antigua and Barbuda vs Bulgaria: Universal right to vote

Antigua and Barbuda
2
in 2025
Bulgaria
2
in 2025
Antigua and Barbuda rank
1st
Bulgaria rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Bulgaria
00.511.52187819512025

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 2 against 2 in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.

Across all 75 years both countries report, Bulgaria has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Bulgaria ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Bulgaria Difference Ahead
1950s 2 2 0 β€”
1960s 2 2 0 β€”
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Antigua and Barbuda or Bulgaria?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 2 against 2 in Bulgaria as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Antigua and Barbuda and Bulgaria?
0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Bulgaria?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Bulgaria rank globally for universal right to vote?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Bulgaria ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.